Biznology
Where business and technology create a winning customer experience.

SPAM!

Image by david ॐ via Flickr

I’ve been writing more and more lately about how the Internet is affecting public relations, including last month’s newsletter on counting clips, but today I want to talk about another PR practice: spammy pitch e-mails. Often, the one adjustment that PR pros have made to their work habits because of the Internet is to e-mail their press releases to incredibly long lists of journalists. In recent years, they’ve included bloggers and other non-traditional journalists. But journalists hate it, for the same reasons that anyone hates unsolicited e-mail–it wastes their time. Today, I want to talk to you about a new service for PR folks that makes it just as easy to send press release pitches to the right people as to the wrong people. Perhaps it’s one step toward the end of PR spam.

To understand what’s going on here, it’s important to recognize why spammy pitching exists as a practice. It’s not because public relations types are bad people. It’s because it is incredibly labor-intensive to identify the right journalists to whom a press release is relevant.

Think about it. You have written your press release. Your client is expecting you to get the story into as much media as possible. You have two choices:

  • You can spend hours, days, or even weeks painstakingly researching which journalists have written about similar subjects, and pare your sending list down to just those few. Or…
  • You can just send the release to the entire list.

What would you expect people to do more often? Especially because you never know who might print the release, so it seems “safer” to send it to everyone. Except in the long run, it’s not safer.

In the long run, more and more journalists will tune out press releases in their e-mails or even take the step of blocking any communication from PR people who have spammed them in the past. Chris Anderson, the editor of Wired Magazine, famously posted the e-mail addresses of spammers. Other journalists might even take down their public e-mail addresses.

Now, none of that might be bad for the PR business. I mean, if people put their press releases online, and they make sure that they’ve done the right search marketing work, then theoretically anyone who is interested in the information can find it.

But if PR people would like to be able to pitch press releases, they probably need to find a way to do so that finds only the right journalists without annoying everyone else. That’s why I did some work for a new service debuting today that makes it easy for PR people to identify the right people to send a press release to. [Full disclosure: I worked as a paid consultant for this service but do not have any ownership interest.]

The service, called MatchPoint, is very simple. A PR person can take any press release and paste it into the tool. Then MatchPoint checks that release against the by-lined news stories written in the last few months to create a list of journalists that have written about that subject. Then the PR person can create personal pitches to send to each one of those interested journalists.

The result? Only those interested will receive the pitch, and it’s not much more work for the PR person than sending to the massive list of people that get annoyed today. The service is free to try for 10 days and costs just $65 a month after that. I hope that PR people will realize that they can’t continue blanket e-mailing without ruining the whole pitching part of their business. If you’re a PR person, check out MatchPoint and see how easy it is to send your press releases to the right people. And feel good about yourself for contributing to the end of public relations spam.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone
Mike Moran

About Mike Moran

Mike Moran has a unique blend of marketing and technology skills that he applies to raise return on investment for large marketing programs. Mike is a former IBM Distinguished Engineer and a senior strategist at Converseon, a leading social consultancy. Mike is the author of two books on digital marketing, an instructor at several leading universities, as well as a Senior Fellow at the Society for New Communications Research.

9 replies to this post
  1. You have two choices:
    * You can spend hours, days, or even weeks painstakingly researching which journalists have written about similar subjects, and pare your sending list down to just those few. Or…
    * You can just send the release to the entire list.
    em, good post.very useful information.

  2. Hi Joe,
    Thanks for the comment. MatchPoint complements any higher-end PR product because it focuses on matching stories with journalists through content, which the others don’t do. Its price point is fine for SMBs but also shows that it’s not intended as a replacement for anything used by large companies.

  3. It looks a nice service at affordable cost. Every one hates spam so as i. But with match point you can assure yourself of delivering your information to the right person.

  4. I completely agree with your post. I work at a pr firm and am in charge of putting together the media lists for pitching. (Typically, it’s the responsibilty of the newest/youngest person at the firm to do this) I HATE putting together these massive lists because it IS spam. But unfortunately, my higher-ups ring me every time i dont add every journalists and their mom to the list. I look forward to the day to where my bosses get a clue that this method is a major FAIL

  5. What are journalists doing repeating PR crap? Don’t they know who Edward Bernays is?
    Oh, I forgot, The fast majority of journalists are lazy English majors that know practically nothing about what they are writing about which explains why “journalists” were “wrong” about the Iraq War and weapons of mass destruction, about the housing market in 2005, were wrong about the dot.com bubble in 1998, didn’t bother to mention Operation Ajax with regard to September 11th, 2001, missed the story on how much money was funneled through AIG to banks like Goldman Sachs and instead concentrated on piddly bonuses, forgot that Franklin Raines got off scott free for his criminal conduct at Fannie Mae, …
    Journalists don’t do news anymore. People on the internet do. Journalists in the vast majority are nothing more than worthless distractions to readers, and useful propagandists to whoever feeds them their information.
    If journalists did their job, Jim Cramer would not have escaped jail when he admitted on the air to violating SEC rules, like Martha Stewart did for doing insider trading that saved her 40,000 dollars when she was a billionaire.
    Media is a joke in this nation. Pravda is more informative about what goes on in this nation today than any mainstream media is in this country.
    You guys are hoot and most of you are incompetent. You know what the next bubble is in the financial sector that isn’t being reported?
    Treasury Bills.
    But you won’t hear it in our “media”. Must be all the PR spam that prevents journalists from knowing the blatantly obvious that is blatantly obvious only if you do a few hours of research.

Leave a Reply

Webinars

video

Yesterday, our author Tim Peter presented our latest Biznology webinar about digital marketing trends for the next year.  Is your competitive...